Comments

Bush had tried from 2001 to warn Us,but Frank and Reid stood in the

way of the message getting out every time.

[this is good]
NYT - notice date below.
Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage LendingBy STEVEN A. HOLMES
Published: Thursday, September 30, 1999


In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.

The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''

Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.

Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.

In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.

Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.

The Bush administration was encouraging MORE regulation while noting that it was the regulatory process that Required Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac to employ risky business practices. By that time the CEO's had thrown their up their hands and walked out leaving the Magnate managers to step in and rape the system for everything they could get personally. MORE regulation was required to turn the Titanic around. The big spend Liberals and the regulator frenzy feeding is what led to the inevitable collapse of these giants. Even if the conservatives had managed to pass reform regulations, this boat was already in the iceberg zone. I seriously doubt anything the conservatives could have done, given the level of Democrat resistance to reform, would have been enough to prevent the tragedy even 7 years ahead of the actual event. If Bush and his team had taken drastic measures to correct the problem, they would have effectively taken ownership of the shipwreck prior to the event. That didn't prevent the Democrats and media from trying to foist the blame on his administration anyway. Thankfully we do have video records of these idiots putting the ship to full steam ahead and preventing the little effort the conservatives did make to be on record as reformers.

Politics is a short game for sure, but it is also a long game where few ever know anything about the strategies and maneuvering by the party planners and engineers. Long after the fact we can look back and see some of the 'lucky' turns.
[this is good]
We know that queer boy Franks and sernator Didd were the cause of all this depression we are sliding into ,, BUT the press will never admit it ,,,,,,,
Even a slow, 2nd grader could have seen this coming, and these are supposedly 'educated' representatives who have the power to allot our money in certain ways. How could they be so lamely 'blind' to what was happening? They weren't, but they saw where they could get votes, and they could get 'free money' - from us!

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

2nd amendment

About Me

2nd amendment
United States
“When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty” Thomas Jefferson

Archives